Ripple Lawyer Criticizes SEC Enforcement in Kraken Legal Battle, Reveals Flaws
Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, has voiced strong support for Kraken in its legal battle against the U.S. SEC. With a bold defense, Alderoty has spotlighted a key takeaway from the court’s recent decision: the notion of a “crypto asset security” is not recognized. According to Alderoty, this is a significant setback for the SEC’s enforcement strategy, which relies heavily on legal disputes to regulate the cryptocurrency industry.
Though experts and crypto enthusiasts cheered the judgment, SEC overreach continues. Let’s delve deeper.
Court Ruling Sparks Debate
The tension increased when U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick denied Kraken’s motion to dismiss the SEC’s lawsuit, requiring the exchange to respond within 20 days. Despite this setback, Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer, Marco Santori, saw a positive aspect in the court’s ruling.
Santori pointed out that the court recognized the ambiguity in the SEC’s argument that Kraken’s tokens are securities, describing the regulator’s stance as “unclear at best and confusing at worst.”
The Core Issue: What Defines Security?
Santori also compared the court’s decision to Ripple’s legal challenges. He noted that, similar to Ripple’s case, the court differentiated between a crypto token and the agreements related to it. This suggests that the SEC’s broad claim that all tokens are securities is flawed. To proceed, the SEC would need to prove that each transaction on Kraken qualifies as a security—a task Santori believes the regulator cannot achieve.
Bill Morgan highlights that the SEC vs Kraken decision supports Judge Torres’ earlier ruling in the SEC vs Ripple case, affirming that the token itself is not considered a security.
SEC Overreach Under Fire
Santori also criticized the SEC’s method of regulating the crypto industry through enforcement actions. He warned that applying this approach across the industry could lead to prolonged, costly litigation, with billions of transactions needing review. Such a method, he argues, is neither practical nor sustainable. With support from figures like Alderoty, Kraken is preparing for a long fight, confident in its ability to succeed.
6/ The SEC unqualifiedly lost on this “tokens are securities” theory, and will not be permitted to rely on it going forward.
Instead, it will need to prove, for every alleged transaction on Kraken, that the Howey Test factors are satisfied.
They aren’t, and we look forward to…
— Marco Santori (@msantoriESQ) August 23, 2024
Industry-Wide Response
As Kraken and other crypto exchanges, such as Coinbase, face increasing scrutiny from the SEC, the industry is stepping up its compliance efforts. This ongoing pressure has prompted other crypto companies, including Binance, to enhance their compliance measures in response to SEC oversight.
Let’s discuss: Is the SEC’s regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies the right one?
As Kraken and other crypto exchanges fight for their right to operate, it’s clear that the future of the industry hinges on a fair and balanced regulatory framework. Will that happen? Time will tell.
Source link
#Kraken #SEC #Legal #Battle #Ripple #Lawyer #Slams #SEC #Enforcement #Exposes #Flaws
